ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To develop an interactive, living map of family medicine training and practice; and to appreciate the role of family medicine within, and its effect on, health systems across the world. COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE: A subgroup of the College of Family Physicians of Canada's Besrour Centre for Global Family Medicine developed connections with selected international colleagues with expertise in international family medicine practice and teaching, health systems, and capacity building to map family medicine globally. In 2022, this group received support from the Foundation for Advancing Family Medicine's Trailblazers initiative to advance this work. METHODS: In 2018 groups of Wilfrid Laurier University (Waterloo, Ont) students conducted broad searches of relevant articles about family medicine in different regions and countries around the world; they conducted focused interviews and then synthesized and verified information, developing a database of family medicine training and practice around the world. Outcome measures were age of family medicine training programs and duration and type of family medicine postgraduate training. REPORT: To approach the question of how delivery of the family medicine model of primary care can affect health system performance, relevant data on family medicine were collated-the presence, nature, duration, and type of training and role within health care systems. The website https://www.globalfamilymedicine.org now has up-to-date country-level data on family medicine practice around the world. This publicly available information will allow such data to be correlated together with health system outputs and outcomes and will be updated as necessary through a wiki-type process. While Canada and the United States only have residency training, countries such as India have master's or fellowship programs, in part accounting for the complexity of the discipline. The maps also identify where family medicine training does not yet exist. CONCLUSION: Mapping family medicine around the world will allow researchers, policy makers, and health care workers to have an accurate picture of family medicine and its impact using relevant, up-to-date information. The group's next aim is to develop data on parameters by which performance in various domains can be measured across settings and to display these in an accessible form.
Subject(s)
Family Practice , Internship and Residency , Humans , Family Practice/education , Physicians, Family/education , Canada , Capacity BuildingABSTRACT
Clinical practice guidelines can improve the clinical and social care for marginalized populations, thereby improving health equity. The aim of this study is to identify determinants of guideline implementation from the perspective of patients and practitioner stakeholders for a homeless health guideline. We completed a mixed-method study to identify determinants of equitable implementation of homeless health guidelines, focusing on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Feasibility, Acceptability, Cost, and Equity Survey (GRADE-FACE) health equity implementation outcomes. The study included a survey and framework analysis. Eighty-eight stakeholders, including practitioners and 16 persons with lived experience of homelessness, participated in the study. Most participants favourably rated the drafted recommendations' priority status, feasibility, acceptability, cost, equity impact, and intent-to-implement. Qualitative analysis uncovered stakeholder concerns and perceptions regarding "fragmented services". Practitioners were reluctant to care for persons with lived experience of homelessness, suggesting that associated social stigma serves as a barrier for this population to access healthcare. Participants called for improved "training of practitioners" to increase knowledge of patient needs and preferences. We identified several knowledge translation strategies that may improve implementation of guidelines for marginalized populations. Such strategies should be considered by other guideline development groups who aim to improve health outcomes in the context of limited and fragmented resources, stigma, and need for advocacy.
